The Michael Jackson biopic 'Michael' is a box office hit, but it's leaving some viewers uneasy
The film is pulling in millions worldwide, yet its portrayal of Jackson stirs discomfort amid lasting questions about his legacy
At a glance
What matters most
- Michael opened at number one in China with $4.8 million and topped $217 million globally in its first weekend, setting a record for musical biopics
- The film avoids directly addressing the child sexual abuse allegations against Jackson, focusing instead on his artistry and personal struggles
- Critics and audiences are divided, with some praising the performances and music, while others feel the movie sidesteps hard truths
Across the spectrum
What people are saying
A quick look at how the same story is being framed from different angles.
On the Left
The film sidesteps accountability by ignoring the abuse allegations entirely, offering a nostalgic celebration that feels out of step with today's conversations about power, consent, and survivor voices. Honoring Jackson's artistry doesn't require erasing the harm linked to his name.
In the Center
Biopics have to make choices about scope and focus, and 'Michael' clearly aims to highlight Jackson's creative genius. While the lack of engagement with the allegations is notable, the film may be trying to occupy a space between tribute and truth without pretending to be a definitive account.
On the Right
This is a music biopic, not a documentary - it's meant to celebrate Jackson's unmatched influence on global pop culture. Audiences should be free to appreciate his art without being forced into moral reckonings every time they watch a performance come to life on screen.
Full coverage
What you should know
The new Michael Jackson biopic, "Michael," is making waves at the global box office, raking in $217 million in its opening weekend and landing firmly at the top of the China box office chart with $4.8 million. Directed by Antoine Fuqua and produced by Universal, the film marks the biggest debut ever for a musical biopic, drawing fans with its lush recreations of Jackson's performances and behind-the-scenes glimpses of his creative process. In China, it edged out local releases during a quiet weekend, signaling strong international appetite for the King of Pop's story.
But as ticket sales climb, so does the discomfort. The film deliberately steers clear of the most controversial aspects of Jackson's life, particularly the multiple allegations of child sexual abuse that followed him for decades. Instead, it focuses on his rise to fame, his relationship with his family, and his relentless drive for perfection in music and performance. While some viewers appreciate the emphasis on his artistry, others feel the omission creates a sanitized version of a man whose legacy is anything but simple.
Writing for Salon, critic Hanif Abdurraqib described the film as "fittingly odd," not because of its style or structure, but because of the tension it can't quite resolve: how to honor a cultural icon while ignoring the serious accusations that defined his final years. The movie doesn't name the accusers or depict any of the legal proceedings, choosing instead to show Jackson as a wounded, isolated figure battling pain, prescription drugs, and the pressures of fame.
This selective storytelling has sparked debate. Supporters argue that the film isn't meant to be a courtroom drama but a portrait of artistic genius under strain. They point to the powerful performance by the lead actor and the meticulous recreation of iconic moments, like the "Thriller" video shoot and the 1983 Motown 25 performance, as reasons to separate the art from the artist. Yet critics say that in 2026, that separation feels less like respect and more like avoidance.
The box office numbers suggest most audiences aren't letting those questions stop them from buying tickets. "Michael" earned $120.4 million from international markets outside North America, with strong showings not just in China but across Europe and parts of Latin America. Its success adds to a recent wave of music biopics, from "Elvis" to "A Complete Unknown," showing studios that star-powered origin stories still draw crowds.
Still, the conversation around "Michael" feels different. Jackson's influence on music and dance is undeniable, but so is the pain caused by the allegations and the unresolved grief of those who felt failed by the systems that protected him. The film doesn't try to answer those questions - and maybe it's not its job to. But by not engaging with them at all, it leaves a silence that some find louder than any scene.
As "Michael" rolls out in more markets this week, it's likely to keep breaking records. Whether it also sparks a deeper cultural reckoning - or simply lets fans revisit a beloved artist without confronting the hard parts - remains to be seen.
About this author
Zwely News Staff compiles multi-source reporting into concise, viewpoint-aware coverage for readers who want context without noise.
Source Notes
China Box Office: ‘Michael’ Claims Top Spot During Another Sluggish Weekend
Universal’s biographical drama “Michael” debuted at the top of the China box office during the April 24–26 weekend, earning RMB32.6 million ($4.8 million), according to data from Artisan Gateway. With $217.3 million, “Michael” is also the N...
Box Office: ‘Michael’ Bows to $217 Million Globally, ‘Mario’ Surpasses $800 Million, ‘Project Hail Mary’ Rockets Past $600 Million
“Michael” glided to the top of the box office charts with $217 million globally, the biggest opening weekend of all time for any musical biopic. Those ticket sales include a mighty $120.4 million from 82 international markets, as well as $9...
The inescapable unease of the Michael Jackson biopic
Antoine Fuqua's "Michael" movie is fittingly odd, but not for the reasons you might expect
Previous story
Obama speaks out after failed attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, urging unity and calm
Next story